<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Laura Paskus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://southwestreporter.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://southwestreporter.com</link>
	<description>Laura Paskus: Reporter and Editor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is this thing? by Bosque Bill</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/what-is-this-thing#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Bosque Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=1119#comment-210</guid>
		<description>A tin can with holes punched in the bottom? Maybe something left from a homeless encampment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tin can with holes punched in the bottom? Maybe something left from a homeless encampment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Down by the Rio &#8211; Alameda Edition by Bosque Bill</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/down-by-the-rio-alameda-edition#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Bosque Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=1093#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Weather permitting I ride my bike across the Alameda Bridge three times a week. I noticed mid-last-week the river seemed higher which was curious as there hadn&#039;t been any storms upstream lately and it was too early for anticipated (miserable) spring run-off.

Now that it is lower again (judging by your photos, as I haven&#039;t crossed yet today,) I suddenly remember the MRGCD irrigation season began on March 1st. So earlier, higher rio flows were probably water released upstream for irrigation, I&#039;m guessing. And the lower flow now, due to that water being redirected into the acequias.

At least these days we have the minimum flow in an attempt to protect the silvery minnow. When was growing up here, it was quite normal to have no water at all in the Rio Grande through Albuquerque in summer as all of it was redirected - the water from the drainage ditches would just soak into the sand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weather permitting I ride my bike across the Alameda Bridge three times a week. I noticed mid-last-week the river seemed higher which was curious as there hadn&#8217;t been any storms upstream lately and it was too early for anticipated (miserable) spring run-off.</p>
<p>Now that it is lower again (judging by your photos, as I haven&#8217;t crossed yet today,) I suddenly remember the MRGCD irrigation season began on March 1st. So earlier, higher rio flows were probably water released upstream for irrigation, I&#8217;m guessing. And the lower flow now, due to that water being redirected into the acequias.</p>
<p>At least these days we have the minimum flow in an attempt to protect the silvery minnow. When was growing up here, it was quite normal to have no water at all in the Rio Grande through Albuquerque in summer as all of it was redirected &#8211; the water from the drainage ditches would just soak into the sand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Down by the Rio by Down by the Rio &#8211; Alameda Edition &#124; Laura Paskus</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/down-by-the-rio#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Down by the Rio &#8211; Alameda Edition &#124; Laura Paskus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=1082#comment-208</guid>
		<description>[...] Down by the Rio &#8211; Alameda Edition  March 3rd, 2013 &#124; No Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Down by the Rio &#8211; Alameda Edition  March 3rd, 2013 | No Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Insta-Love for the Middle Rio Grande by benito</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/insta-love-for-the-middle-rio-grande#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>benito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 04:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=930#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Great shots Laura!  We really miss living by the river.

Love your recent coyote piece too BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great shots Laura!  We really miss living by the river.</p>
<p>Love your recent coyote piece too BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I love you, Albuquerque by Laura</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/i-love-you-albuquerque#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 03:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=417#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your note, Andy. I appreciate it. 

I should have clarified that that&#039;s for ag-to-municipal water rights transfers. (And I received that pricing from a water broker in the area, who told me: &quot;Water in the MRG sells for about $15,000 per acre foot of consumptive use.  This price includes transactional costs.&quot;)

Please do keep in touch. The issues are so complex--mind-numbingly so--that I&#039;m always super happy to learn more and think more deeply about all of this. You may reach me via email at laura.paskus@gmail.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your note, Andy. I appreciate it. </p>
<p>I should have clarified that that&#8217;s for ag-to-municipal water rights transfers. (And I received that pricing from a water broker in the area, who told me: &#8220;Water in the MRG sells for about $15,000 per acre foot of consumptive use.  This price includes transactional costs.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Please do keep in touch. The issues are so complex&#8211;mind-numbingly so&#8211;that I&#8217;m always super happy to learn more and think more deeply about all of this. You may reach me via email at <a href="mailto:laura.paskus@gmail.com">laura.paskus@gmail.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I love you, Albuquerque by Andy Smith</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/i-love-you-albuquerque#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 03:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=417#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Hi....I saw your video session with Matt and John and thought it was great and very timely. This note is to make sure you have a clear picture of the price for water rights. You mentioned that, in this area, they are going for twelve to fifteen thousand dollars per acre-foot (AF) and that, of course, is for the right to take that much, per year--- forever. The going rate for an AF (about 325,000 gallons), between large users (cities, etc.) is a few hundred dollars. Because you did not say &quot;X dollars per acre-foot per year, forever&quot;, I wanted to  mention and clarify this.

These numbers are interesting and they bring in to the picture ea number of other related numbers that it would be good, for those of us who are interested, to share and double-check. One is the amount of water that the cities consider to be &quot;unaccounted for water (UAW)&quot; and this is a fairly big number (in the 10% range, of the total water used). Albuquerque uses about 60,000 AF per year and that could amount to about 6,000 (K) AF. 

Another important point is that the larger cities use very little water, indoors. Almost all of the consumptive-use is outdoors---because we have a closed distribution system and almost all of the inside or indoors water is returned to the utilities and either cleaned and reused or returned to the river. If you take a shower (as a utility customer), for example, your consumptive-use is probably less than a pint. Everything else (99+%) is returned to the system,  Almost everything we use, in these cities, is associated with lawns, parks, playing fields, farms, etc. We probably don&#039;t use a gallon of water per person per day,indoors -- and there are an awful lot of folks who do not have lawns. The folks who are not connected to utility systems and use wells and the folks who have lawns are, of course, another story. 

There are a number of us who are trying to follow these things closely and understand such things as this and we will be happy to keep in touch with you and share whatever we can. There are major issues to discuss in all of the areas of interest (quality, supply, conservation, etc.) and we will try to keep you informed and to have a confidential running dialogue with you.

If possible, please send me a copy of this note, in a reply, because your system does not do that automatically. Thanks.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&#8230;.I saw your video session with Matt and John and thought it was great and very timely. This note is to make sure you have a clear picture of the price for water rights. You mentioned that, in this area, they are going for twelve to fifteen thousand dollars per acre-foot (AF) and that, of course, is for the right to take that much, per year&#8212; forever. The going rate for an AF (about 325,000 gallons), between large users (cities, etc.) is a few hundred dollars. Because you did not say &#8220;X dollars per acre-foot per year, forever&#8221;, I wanted to  mention and clarify this.</p>
<p>These numbers are interesting and they bring in to the picture ea number of other related numbers that it would be good, for those of us who are interested, to share and double-check. One is the amount of water that the cities consider to be &#8220;unaccounted for water (UAW)&#8221; and this is a fairly big number (in the 10% range, of the total water used). Albuquerque uses about 60,000 AF per year and that could amount to about 6,000 (K) AF. </p>
<p>Another important point is that the larger cities use very little water, indoors. Almost all of the consumptive-use is outdoors&#8212;because we have a closed distribution system and almost all of the inside or indoors water is returned to the utilities and either cleaned and reused or returned to the river. If you take a shower (as a utility customer), for example, your consumptive-use is probably less than a pint. Everything else (99+%) is returned to the system,  Almost everything we use, in these cities, is associated with lawns, parks, playing fields, farms, etc. We probably don&#8217;t use a gallon of water per person per day,indoors &#8212; and there are an awful lot of folks who do not have lawns. The folks who are not connected to utility systems and use wells and the folks who have lawns are, of course, another story. </p>
<p>There are a number of us who are trying to follow these things closely and understand such things as this and we will be happy to keep in touch with you and share whatever we can. There are major issues to discuss in all of the areas of interest (quality, supply, conservation, etc.) and we will try to keep you informed and to have a confidential running dialogue with you.</p>
<p>If possible, please send me a copy of this note, in a reply, because your system does not do that automatically. Thanks.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Mexico Supreme Court rules against governor by KitchenAid FGA Food Grinder Attachment for Stand Mixers</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/new-mexico-supreme-court-rules-against-governor#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>KitchenAid FGA Food Grinder Attachment for Stand Mixers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=359#comment-201</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;........&lt;/strong&gt;

An attention-grabbing discussion is price comment. I believe that it&#039;s best to write extra on this subject, it may not be a taboo topic but usually people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8230;&#8230;..</strong></p>
<p>An attention-grabbing discussion is price comment. I believe that it&#8217;s best to write extra on this subject, it may not be a taboo topic but usually people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NM&#8217;s best books on the environment by Mike Eisenfeld</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/nms-best-books-on-the-environment#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Eisenfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=579#comment-186</guid>
		<description>The Chaco Coal Scandal: The People&#039;s Victory over James Watt by Jeff Radford is a interesting tale concerning coal leases in NW New Mexico during the James Watt era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chaco Coal Scandal: The People&#8217;s Victory over James Watt by Jeff Radford is a interesting tale concerning coal leases in NW New Mexico during the James Watt era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Necessary Reading by Laura Paskus</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/necessary-reading#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Paskus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 04:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=499#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Thanks for looking out for me; I&#039;m also reading an Isabel Allende novel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for looking out for me; I&#8217;m also reading an Isabel Allende novel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Necessary Reading by Sharon Guynup</title>
		<link>http://southwestreporter.com/blog/necessary-reading#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Guynup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southwestreporter.com/?p=499#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I think you need to get your hands on a lyrical, uplifting novel!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to get your hands on a lyrical, uplifting novel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
